/starlet/ - Starlet

📸 Cute Girls and Autistic Discussions 📸

Mode: Reply
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 4096

Files

Max file size: 100.00 MB

Max files: 5

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


Please read the FAQ before posting. Note: Just because a girl has Instagram and you like her, does not mean she needs a thread. Not every girl needs a thread! There are other spaces to share said pictures on this site.

Looks like piper jumped ship from BA to passes as well. Kinda sucks because people have been sharing BA content but not passes as much, not to mention the lower and extremely shitty watermarks.
>>147042 ĂŤs the content good at least ? i have to give credit to her cause most girls watered down their content, but not her, she making the hotest stuff so far
>>147049 I haven't seen her passes stuff yet >most girls watered down their content kinda debatable. Some of her best content was from a 2-4 years ago when she would do bikini and Fashion Nova hauls which she would post for free on YouTube
>>147051 Thiiis.
My advice to anyone is to stay away from passes unless you love being scammed and don't respect your wallet. I've subbed to Lily's passes on the $250 "Diamond Member" access and it does NOT unlock everything. She sends her best sets via DMs that you have to pay extra to unlock. As an example, Lily sent out 3 mass DMs for bikini sets today. One which is $80 to unlock for 19 images. Another one that's $45 to unlock for 14 images. The last was $40 to unlock for 8 images and 3 videos of 19 seconds
>>147054 Oh and no previews of what the sets are either, so it's a mystery until you click on the unlock button and pay money lol
>>147054 Yeah all girls copy each other and that has been the pattern on Passes since it's inception, BA wasn't so bad but passes is really shitty. I hope no one subs but I know there's way too many horny simps
>>147058 I made the mistake so none of you have to unless you want to waste your money that is. It's really not worth it. BA had better content and wasn't as pricey as passes
(2.80 MB 576x1024 VID_20240705[...].mp4)
>>147054 That can't be a sustainable business model. But I guess it doesn't exactly have to be...it's a cash grab
>>147054 Passes UI is also just horrible. Everything about the website sucks compared to BA.
>>147042 What’s the link to her passes?
>>147143 i actually agree with this. i find that BA is actually pretty good except for the fact that they completely ruined everything after their latest update. now any new photos that are posted on BA are heavily compressed. the image resolution is really low & the quality sucks
(2.19 MB 3024x4032 k3kqx2m1rjk9f4v2k6p5.jpeg)
(1.29 MB 1936x2581 yp21rk28wrxpfk4xlr9r.jpeg)
(3.07 MB 3024x4032 pwnv8yx35q0yaxpr7r94.jpeg)
>>147173 Could u give some resolution and fiIesize comparison examples of the new compression low-res pics vs old pics? for example >>>/w/475893 shows that even on the old BA, Creators were already upping to BA both low and high quality pics of various sizes so it was their fault if the pic was low res, not the fault of (old) BA
>>147174 an example of what i'm referring to would be that photos posted by a creator that were previously 1365 x 2048 & around 324KB are now 800 x 1067 & around 201KB or even lower. one other thing that i noticed is that all of these lower quality photos do not have the BA watermark that appears on older photos
>>147177 also the URL for these compressed photos begins with s dot brandarmy dot com / assets / i which is different from the previous URL that began with assets dot brandarmy dot com & had the folder name for the creator
>>147177 >1067*800=853600 >2048*1365=2795520 >853600/2795520=30.5% of og resolution >201/324=62% of og fiIesize Wowzers! Im assuming u are comparing the exact same pics just old and new version As a reminder to others >>>/w/475468 old BA even had 4+mb pics >>147178 Oddly enough the old pic urI still works, but this new urI schemce has to be the last warning call that if u dont jdownloader2 them now they will finally be 4o4 sooner than later
>>147181 yeah, it appears that BA has already begun the process of switching the URL to the new one that has the compressed pics. they just haven't done it to all of them yet and it does seem like the older url still works, but i think they'll eventually switch everything over to this new url w/ worse quality pics
(5.97 MB 576x1024 piperrockelle - .mp4)
(2.59 MB 576x1024 piperrockelle - [...].mp4)
(3.54 MB 576x1024 piperrockelle - [...].mp4)
(6.76 MB 576x1024 piperrockelle - [...].mp4)
(1.07 MB 720x1280 VID_20240708[...].mp4)
>>147042 >>147051 What is the link to her passes? I can’t find it.
>>147042 >>147665 She is not on Passes so I'm not sure what this person was talking about. Also, nothing on Passes is watermarked or low quality. All of the pictures on there are full quality.
>>147672 >Nothing on passes is watermarked U are a moron See:>>>/w/475613 and blog.passes.com/features/how-we-track-down-leakers
>>147677 Passes pathetic 700kb pic vs >>147174 (old) BA's 3mb pic lol
>>147677 I should have clarified that nothing I've downloaded on Passes is watermarked. I'm guessing the creator hasn't enabled that feature then, and while the pic quality might not match the old BA's quality, 4000 x 3000 and 1.2mb is still not low quality.
>>147681 Yes, but that is no longer the case on BA now since people have said the pictures are now compressed and low quality. So, passes now has better quality than BA.
(198.43 KB 1400x1867 196240f9-ff7a-44[...].jpeg)
new BA shit quality confirmed.
(250.45 KB 1440x1799 piperrockelle-09[...].jpg)
(141.46 KB 1440x1800 piperrockelle-09[...].jpg)
(196.39 KB 1440x1800 piperrockelle-09[...].jpg)
>>147721 so give or take the same resolution and file size as compressed to hell IG, God help us
>>147722 contrast IG and BA to friggin vsco.co/nataliebiiden/media/6493008471d0d56e7b984e8c im.vsco.co/aws-us-west-2/d72e88/5556720/6493008471d0d56e7b984e8c/vsco_062123.jpg 200kb vs 1.5mb, which is higher than even 700kb passes we are so f'd
>>147722 basically same crappy quality as IG. actually, in some cases you could even get better quality from IG if they post the pic to their story higlights
seems like platforms are now competing for the trophy to the shittiest quality.
(564.80 KB 576x1024 VID_20240717[...].mp4)
>>146261 >white boy She isnt built for him
(6.16 MB 1080x1920 piperrockelle [...].mp4)
(1.32 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
(1.34 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
(1.36 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
(1.31 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
(1.40 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
(1.28 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
(1.41 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
(1.40 MB 1080x1920 vlcsnap-2024-07-[...].png)
Almost every single person she used to have in her life has abandoned her, and all that is left are adult males on the internet who like her body. It's sad.
(7.50 MB 720x1280 SaveIG.App_3[...].mp4)
>>149932 okay lev
(3.65 MB 576x1024 2024-07-22_@[...].mp4)
>>149932 Sounds like she's hard to deal with
>>149933 >okay lev Am I wrong? >>149939 >Sounds like she's hard to deal with More that her mom is hard to deal with, if the rumors are accurate.
(1.85 MB 1080x1920 VID_20240729[...].mp4)
(516.15 KB 1400x1867 24tvd32.jpg)
yet another tat but how can I stay mad at those legs
>>152307 The one on her side? That's been there a while.
(49.50 KB 586x1268 pie (1).jpg)
(59.78 KB 596x1290 pie (3).jpg)
(126.33 KB 984x2048 pie (2).jpg)
>>152308 I'm drunk as fuck. I don't even remember what tats she's had, lol she better keep that lower half intact
>>152310 >nitter.poast.org/mharmon993/status/1811559709700186360 I can only hope that this twitter guy, who made these crops u grabbed and upped here made them with a lossless jpg cropper app like LLcrop or sumthang Cause a god pawg like that deserves nothing less than the very best
(174.89 KB 1080x1080 GSQEiI6XQAMORbL.jpg)
Courtesy of mrhamon
(6.60 MB 1080x1920 piperrockelle [...].mp4)
(1.82 MB 480x854 VID_20240818[...].mp4)
(152.07 KB 960x1280 IMG_20240819[...].jpg)
(157.94 KB 960x1280 IMG_20240819[...].jpg)

Delete
Report

no cookies?